Author summary
28% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Roberts results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 2,741 hits . Analysis detected 8,910 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,271 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,646 of 6,604 authors). This James Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. James Roberts
Author details
Total words: 13,271
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 20.6% 20.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 20.6%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst