Speaker summary
40% 29 analyzed articles/videos 1,315.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kazem Gharibabadi results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Begging the Question , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,870.035 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,315.333 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,488 of 26,862 speakers). This Kazem Gharibabadi is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Kazem Gharibabadi
Speaker details
Total words: 1,315.333
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score29 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst