Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Wayland results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 214 hits . Analysis detected 1,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,571 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,026 of 6,171 authors). This Michael Wayland is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Michael Wayland
Author details
Total words: 2,571
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst