Speaker summary
56% 13 analyzed articles/videos 584.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Carville results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and In-Group Bias , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 233 hits . Analysis detected 1,772.538 faulty-reasoning hits from 584.333 analyzed words across 13 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,256 of 28,364 speakers). This James Carville is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. James Carville
Speaker details
Total words: 584.333
Content count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.9% percentile 6.0% BS Score13 analyzed videos584.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Dunning-Kruger Effect Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst