Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arthur Schaper results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 2,947 hits. Analysis detected 20,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (1,316 of 6,244 authors). This Arthur Schaper is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Arthur Schaper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠79%Arthur Schaper (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,632
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 30.6%30.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 16.6%16.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.4%19.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 9.9%9.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.9%7.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos