Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Sullivan results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 1,874 hits. Analysis detected 12,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (671 of 6,628 authors). This William Sullivan is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
William Sullivan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
90%William Sullivan (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,036
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.9% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 37.2%37.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 31.0%31.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 27.2%27.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 10.8%10.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.2%15.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.2%7.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 31.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 27.2%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Author 10.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos