Speaker summary
56% 108 analyzed articles/videos 11,183.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graham Platner results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 2,701.335 hits . Analysis detected 15,424.036 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,183.667 analyzed words across 108 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,825 of 25,928 speakers). This Graham Platner is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Graham Platner
Speaker details
Total words: 11,183.667
Article count: 108
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score108 analyzed videos11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 22.7% 22.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst