Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Doug Blair results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 969 hits. Analysis detected 5,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,235 authors). This Doug Blair is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Doug Blair
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Doug Blair (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,136
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 30.9%30.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.2%10.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.0%16.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.6%9.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 30.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Author 8.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos