Author summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colton Overcash results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 1,250 hits . Analysis detected 5,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,178 of 6,315 authors). This Colton Overcash is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Colton Overcash
Author details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.4% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 37.4% 37.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.0% 7.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst