Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Miller results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 2,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,553 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,077 of 6,172 authors). This Kevin Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Kevin Miller
Author details
Total words: 2,553
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst