Speaker summary
40% 25 analyzed articles/videos 391.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Protection Agency results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 118.694 hits . Analysis detected 504.064 faulty-reasoning hits from 391.333 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,664 of 28,364 speakers). This Environmental Protection Agency is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Environmental Protection Agency
Speaker details
Total words: 391.333
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score25 analyzed videos391.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst