Author summary
77%1 analyzed article/video1,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 3,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,903 of 6,199 authors). This MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
70%MIKHAIL ZINSHTEY/CalMatters (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 14.8%14.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 5.7%5.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos