Author summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Skinner results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 380 hits. Analysis detected 2,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,626 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (4,609 of 6,427 authors). This Anna Skinner is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Anna Skinner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠29%Anna Skinner (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,626
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos