Speaker summary
77% 15 analyzed articles/videos 1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Ford results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Tu Quoque , and False Dilemma , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 141.121 hits . Analysis detected 1,824.184 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,001 analyzed words across 15 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,817 of 28,364 speakers). This Doug Ford is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Doug Ford
Speaker details
Total words: 1,001
Content count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score15 analyzed videos1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 6.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst