Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos31.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chad Bianco results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 68.4% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,853 of 28,364 speakers). This Chad Bianco is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
40.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos31.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 68.4%68.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 34.2%34.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.2%34.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 68.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos