Speaker summary
39%9 analyzed articles/videos213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Strategic and International Studies results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50.1% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 434.599 faulty-reasoning hits from 213 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,365 of 28,364 speakers). This Center for Strategic and International Studies is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
17.9% BS Score9 analyzed videos213 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often