ZeroHedge70%
Damage To Key US Bases In Gulf So Extensive The Pentagon May Not Rebuild Them 80%
By Tyler Durden61%
6/26/2026, 10:55:00 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 2,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 804 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.4% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,368 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the article peer group.
With each week and month that passes since the start of Trump's Operation Epic Fury, **more and more reports have come out revealing the massive extent of damage to US military facilities in the Mideast region** based on Iran's retaliation across the region.
This is often based on fresh satellite imaging and analysis, despite US government pressure for these research entities to refrain from publishing such data, and to censor open source photographs.
After a series of deep investigative reports, it has been proven time and again that the Pentagon and Washington officials have been downplaying and **covering up the real extent of devastation** caused by Iranian missiles and drones.
More fresh reporting in the Wall Street Journal once again adds confirmation to this, referencing satellite imagery which shows far more serious damage at a key naval base in Bahrain than the US has publicly acknowledged.
The damage is said to be bad enough that the Pentagon is **mulling shrinking its troop presence there and elsewhere in the Gulf**, including a potential reduced troop footprint in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
Iran is hailing this reported pullback as a significant strategic victory produced by its retaliation.
Unnamed officials were cited in the report as saying American forces could **retreat as far westward as Israel**, after some bases essentially became unusable or uninhabitable altogether.
Concerning the Bahrain base details, WSJ writes:
> The U.S.
Navy base in Bahrain was repeatedly **targeted between late February and June**.
Strikes that got through **caused extensive damage**, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of satellite imagery, social-media footage and interviews with current and former servicemembers—damage that the Pentagon hasn’t publicly acknowledged.
**Hit hard were the command headquarters and at least a dozen other buildings, along with two satellite communications terminals**.
>
> The military said no one was killed at the base, known as Naval Support Activity Bahrain, and that the strikes didn’t significantly impact operations.
The U.S. evacuated most personnel but has kept a small staff on the ground.
Notably in Bahrain the headquarters building for the **US Navy in the Middle East was struck and seriously damaged**, along with sensitive communications centers being destroyed.
But here is a key, somewhat unexpected line in the Journal report: "The extensive damage done to America’s sole naval base in the Middle East - **along with hits to at least 20 U.S. sites across the region**, including military installations and diplomatic facilities - **has the U.S. re-evaluating its entire footprint in the region**."
This means that damaged structures and bases **may not be rebuilt at all**, and the sites may just be abandoned as future key US military hubs, WSJ says.
The draw-down of expensive Pentagon comms centers could include from Bahrain: "The military is now considering revamping the base in Bahrain, reducing the U.S. presence in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and moving some bases or base functions west, farther from the reach of Iranian missiles and drones, according to the officials familiar with the deliberations," WSJ writes.
Reconstruction costs would be staggering, per the same report:
> The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated in a report published Tuesday that the total cost of the war was about $40 billion.
**That estimate included their calculus of $2.2 billion to $5.1 billion in damage to U.S. bases**, based on structures that CSIS identified as damaged.
>
> The Journal used satellite images and social-media footage to identify which buildings on the Bahrain base were damaged.
To estimate what it would cost to construct buildings of the same types today, the Journal reviewed a publicly available Defense Department cost model as well as procurement reports.
The estimates only cover construction, and don’t include other costs that could factor into the total if the buildings were to be rebuilt, such as debris removal and reinforcement.
"The estimated construction costs at NSA Bahrain totaled about $400 million," it continues.
But ultimately a draw-back from these locations would be based on the proven reality that Iran can easily hit them at any time.
Some further implications to all this are that in any future flare-up or even return to all-out war between the US and Iran, American forces would find themselves executing a conflict much further away from the theatre itself.
For example, **dozens of major Air Force refueling tankers have already had to be relocated far away from the Gulf, to places like Tel Aviv**.
Many were destroyed in the opening weeks of the war while parked at Gulf airfields, clearly over-exposed as it seems Iran knew exactly where to target.
Back in late March, US officials admitted to the NY Times that Iran's significantly retaliation damaging US bases was "**a war that is much harder to prosecute**."
Speakers
2speakers24%attributed speech613writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageWall Street Journal
142 attributed words74% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.