Topic summary
70% 25 analyzed articles/videos 16,939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Strategy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 7,320 hits . Analysis detected 83,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 75,182 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,380 of 15,327 topics). This Military Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Military Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 75,182
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score25 analyzed articles75.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst