Author summary
54% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Epstein results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,536 hits . Analysis detected 15,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,526 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,343 of 6,244 authors). This Jake Epstein is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Jake Epstein
Author details
Total words: 15,526
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst