Author summary
79% 3 analyzed articles/videos 95 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Leslie results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,332 hits . Analysis detected 10,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,811 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,231 of 6,169 authors). This Robert Leslie is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Robert Leslie
Author details
Total words: 7,811
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.1% 17.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst