Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jessica Orwig results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 4,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Jessica Orwig is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jessica Orwig
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Jessica Orwig (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,602
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 12.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos