Author summary
68% 2 analyzed articles/videos 461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Loh results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 812 hits . Analysis detected 6,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,120 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,906 of 6,359 authors). This Matthew Loh is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Matthew Loh
Author details
Total words: 7,120
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst