Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burak Oktenli results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 500 hits. Analysis detected 3,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,863 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (869 of 6,244 authors). This Burak Oktenli is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Burak Oktenli
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
87%Burak Oktenli (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,863
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.1% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 23.4%23.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.4%13.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 7.7%7.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.7%4.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 5.5%5.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 26.8%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Author 23.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos