Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chris H. Park results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 5,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,693 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Chris H. Park is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chris H. Park
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Chris H. Park (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 9,693
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos