Speaker summary
47% 7 analyzed articles/videos 330.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Carr results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 90.014 hits . Analysis detected 587.6 faulty-reasoning hits from 330.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,967 of 28,265 speakers). This Brendan Carr is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Brendan Carr
Speaker details
Total words: 330.333
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 8.4% BS Score7 analyzed videos330.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.8% 20.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst