Newsmax75%

ABC Files Early Renewal Request, Calls Order Illegal 52%

By David Shepardson0%

5/28/2026, 10:16:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,069 faulty-reasoning hits from 415 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (10,609 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the article peer group.

Walt Disney unit ABC on Thursday filed applications for early license review with the Federal Communications Commission for its eight company-owned television stations after President Donald Trump pressured the regulatory agency to take action. 
The early reviews  the first for a major TV broadcaster in more than 50 years  were ordered in April a day after Trump urged ABC to fire late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. 
Disney said the FCC early license renewal order was "unlawful, arbitrary, and unconstitutional" and violates its First Amendment free speech rights. 
"This effort to suppress speech under the guise of bureaucratic process must not prevail," ABC added. 
"It is an unprecedented attack on a single company's entire portfolio of broadcast licenses." 
The FCC said last month the reviews, which were not supposed to begin until October 2028, were prompted by a yearlong probe on the FCC's ban on unlawful discrimination. 
The stations are located in Fresno, California; Los Angeles; Chicago; San Francisco; New York; Philadelphia; Houston; and Durham, North Carolina. 
The FCC did not immediately comment Thursday. 
Trump has repeatedly urged broadcasters to drop comedy or news programs he dislikes or which have been critical of him, pressing regulators to revoke licenses of broadcasters he says are unfair to him. 
Democrat FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez says the Trump administration is engaged in a targeted effort to censor Disney and its ABC network through a series of sweeping regulatory actions. 
The FCC is also investigating ABC daytime talk show "The View" after declaring it is subject to federal equal time rules for political candidates. 
FCC Chair Brendan Carr opened an investigation in March 2025 into Disney's diversity practices and said Disney submitted documents in the probe that he felt were insufficient. 
He declined to say if a similar review of diversity practices at Comcast and NBC could lead to an early review there. 
ABC rejected the argument that its nondiscrimination policies violated commission rules. 
The company added it believed the proceeding was an exercise to search for a legal pretext to achieve its desired goal. 
The goal is "to ramp up toward possible license revocation and cause the station and others to think twice before they say something the government might dislike," ABC said. 
In November, Trump demanded the FCC revoke ABC licenses after he criticized an ABC News correspondent for asking Saudi Arabia's crown prince about the 2018 killing of a Washington Post columnist in a question he dubbed "insubordinate." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 31.1%David Shepardson: 9.8%Newsmax: 3.4%Confirmation Bias31.1%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.1%David Shepardson: 6.0%Newsmax: 3.2%Availability Heuristic16.1%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 3.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%David Shepardson: 12.3%Newsmax: 11.0%Framing Effect14.2%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.0%David Shepardson: 1.7%Newsmax: 0.9%Status Quo Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 4.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%David Shepardson: 0.8%Newsmax: 2.9%Pessimism Bias3.4%This article: 37.8%David Shepardson: 17.0%Newsmax: 10.3%Negativity Bias37.8%This article: 2.7%David Shepardson: 0.7%Newsmax: 3.0%Self-Serving Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 1.3%Newsmax: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.5%David Shepardson: 1.6%Newsmax: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias6.5%This article: 8.0%David Shepardson: 3.7%Newsmax: 2.7%In-Group Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%David Shepardson: 4.0%Newsmax: 1.9%Recency Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 4.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 14.0%David Shepardson: 7.0%Newsmax: 1.4%Slippery Slope14.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.0%David Shepardson: 5.7%Newsmax: 4.2%Hasty Generalization8.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 7.9%Newsmax: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 2.2%Newsmax: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 25.1%David Shepardson: 10.3%Newsmax: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)25.1%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.4%David Shepardson: 0.8%Newsmax: 0.9%Anecdotal3.4%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 25.8%David Shepardson: 6.4%Newsmax: 3.1%Unattributed Quote25.8%This article: 15.9%David Shepardson: 5.2%Newsmax: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection15.9%This article: 13.0%David Shepardson: 3.3%Newsmax: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice13.0%This article: 10.8%David Shepardson: 3.7%Newsmax: 1.0%Indoctrination10.8%This article: 7.0%David Shepardson: 3.5%Newsmax: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%David Shepardson: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

415 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers55%attributed speech186writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDisney • 21 words • 100.0% coverageABC • 16 words • 100.0% coverageABC • 14 words • 100.0% coverageFederal Communications Commission • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageFederal Communications Commission • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageAnna Gomez • 29 words • 100.0% coverageFederal Communications Commission • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBrendan Carr • 27 words • 100.0% coverageBrendan Carr • 22 words • 0.0% coverageABC • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageABC • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Disney

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words9.2% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Disney: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Disney: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+82.3 ptsWriter: 17.7%Disney: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.