Author summary
77%6 analyzed articles/videos4,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Folkenflik results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 2,821 hits. Analysis detected 19,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,698 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,166 of 6,348 authors). This David Folkenflik is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
David Folkenflik
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
35%David Folkenflik (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,698
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate