Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antonio Villaraigosa results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,393 of 28,364 speakers). This Antonio Villaraigosa is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos