Keyword summary
62% 13 analyzed articles/videos 4,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rand Paul results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 3,389 hits . Analysis detected 26,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,495 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (29,487 of 35,635 keywords). This Rand Paul is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Rand Paul
Keyword details
Total words: 28,495
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score13 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst