Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebeka Zeljko results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,303 hits. Analysis detected 7,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,132 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,275 of 6,316 authors). This Rebeka Zeljko is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Rebeka Zeljko
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
64%Rebeka Zeljko (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,132
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 21.3%21.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 21.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate