Author summary
86% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Knudsen results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 2,565 hits . Analysis detected 20,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,125 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,429 of 6,628 authors). This Hannah Knudsen is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Hannah Knudsen
Author details
Total words: 13,125
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.7% 13.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.2% 16.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst