Breitbart81%

'F*cK ICE 73%

By Hannah Knudsen86% #author72%

7/10/2026, 3:52:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 552 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,017 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the article peer group.

Scandal-plagued Graham Platner has formally withdrawn from Maine’s Senate primary with a final word of “F*ck ICE” and “Free Palestine,” leaving a vacancy in the state’s highly anticipated race as Democrats scramble to find a replacement. 
“I write to formally withdraw my candidacy from United States Senate,” Platner began in his formal statement. 
Platner claimed that Mainers  by nominating him in the state’s Democrat Primary  voted for “Medicare for All; to ban billionaires from buying elections; and for an end to taxpayer-funded genocide and forever wars.” 
WATCH  Mamdani Quickly Denies Graham Platner’s Scandals Will Affect the Leftist Cause: 
“They voted for time and dignity; for strong unions and jobs they can raise families on; for the hope of buying a home; for the chance to retire with grace,” he continued, asserting Americans are “desperate for change.” 
“People are desperate for change. 
For this broke system to be righted. 
For the American experiment to be furthered. 
Over the past eleven months, thousands and thousands of Mainers poured their hearts, time, and talent into a movement to deliver that vision,” he wrote, offering his gratitude. 
“And in submitting this letter today, I seek to further the movement we have built together and the future we believe in,” he said, adding that this notice serves as his “official withdrawal from consideration for this office.” 
He ended his letter with another declaration: “F*ck ICE. 
Free Palestine. 
Up the Hearts.” 
Platner’s departure follows a long series of allegations top Democrats routinely ignored as they continued their support of him. 
Such scandals included his Nazi tattoo as well as bragging about masturbating in public porta-potties, mocking a Purple Heart recipient as a “dumb motherfucker didn’t deserve to live,” smearing rural Maine populations as racist, blaming sexual assault victims for being sexually assaulted, sending explicit sexts to a half-dozen women in 2023 while married, and more. 
However, the final nail in the coffin came last week after a woman accused him of breaking into her home and raping her  allegations he still denies. 
Despite that, top Democrats finally withdrew their support of Platner and called him to drop out of the race. 
The Maine Democratic Party said the process is underway to replace Platner in the race to challenge five-time incumbent Sen. 
Susan Collins (R-ME). 
WATCH  I’m Giving You Softballs! 
GOP Rep Mocks SPLC CEO for Not Condemning Graham Platner’s N@zi Tattoo: 
“As you all know, we have been absolutely committed to transparency. 
So even though it is incredibly late at night, I am coming to you live on the ground from the Maine Dems headquarters,” Maine Democratic Party Executive Director Devon Murphy-Anderson said in a video statement late Thursday, announcing that the process for U.S. 
Senate candidates “is now live.” 
“Candidates now have the ability to submit their declaration of intent and begin engaging Maine Democrats in earnest by earning their support and collecting signatures,” she said. 
“We are fully committed to transparency, so we are making those candidate rules available to everyone, and you can read them at mainedems.org.” 
“We are continuing to race towards the release of our fair and inclusive process to select a new U.S. 
Senate nominee, and we are not leaving this office until that process is in the hands of you, the people,” she declared. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.8%Hannah Knudsen: 4.5%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias16.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.6%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic15.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.1%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 19.4%Hannah Knudsen: 16.2%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect19.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.7%Hannah Knudsen: 1.1%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias16.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.8%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 33.9%Hannah Knudsen: 19.5%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias33.9%This article: 13.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.5%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.4%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 5.2%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.7%Hannah Knudsen: 2.3%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias12.7%This article: 2.4%Hannah Knudsen: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 16.5%Hannah Knudsen: 5.4%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem16.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 4.5%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Hannah Knudsen: 2.4%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 3.8%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.7%Hannah Knudsen: 8.8%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization19.7%This article: 4.5%Hannah Knudsen: 2.1%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring4.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.3%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 35.0%Hannah Knudsen: 11.9%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion35.0%This article: 8.2%Hannah Knudsen: 2.3%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question8.2%This article: 12.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.7%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.2%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal15.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.2%Hannah Knudsen: 1.6%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading4.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.1%Hannah Knudsen: 2.6%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote3.1%This article: 13.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.7%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection13.0%This article: 21.6%Hannah Knudsen: 14.3%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice21.6%This article: 19.4%Hannah Knudsen: 3.3%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination19.4%This article: 6.5%Hannah Knudsen: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 13.7%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.2%

552 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers63%attributed speech207writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 17 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 38 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGraham Platner • 28 words • 100.0% coverageGraham Platner • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMaine Democratic Party • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageDevon Murphy-Anderson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDevon Murphy-Anderson • 43 words • 0.0% coverageDevon Murphy-Anderson • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDevon Murphy-Anderson • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDevon Murphy-Anderson • 23 words • 100.0% coverageDevon Murphy-Anderson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDevon Murphy-Anderson • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Graham Platner

100%flagged-word coverage
175 attributed words51% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Indoctrination+54.8 ptsWriter: 2.9%Graham Platner: 57.7%57.7%Biased Writer Voice-57.5 ptsWriter: 57.5%Graham Platner: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-34.8 ptsWriter: 34.8%Graham Platner: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-17.4 ptsWriter: 17.4%Graham Platner: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+9.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Graham Platner: 9.7%9.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.