Breitbart81%

Poll: Majority of Democrats Say They Would Vote for a ‘Democratic Socialist,’ View Socialism ‘Favorably’ 69%

By Hannah Knudsen86%

7/2/2026, 1:25:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and False Dilemma, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 1,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 491 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,881 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the article peer group.

Most Democrats would vote for a candidate describing themselves as a “Democratic Socialist,” a recent Economist/YouGov survey revealed. 
The survey asked respondents, “Would you ever vote for a candidate who identified as a “Democratic Socialist?” 
Across the board, a plurality of respondents, 45 percent, said they would not vote for such a candidate, followed by 29 percent who said they would and 26 percent who remain unsure. 
Predictably, the vast majority of Republicans, 85 percent, said they would not vote for a “Democratic Socialist,” but most Democrats, 62 percent, said they would do so. 
Further, only 11 percent of Democrats said they would not, and over a quarter, 27 percent, said they are “not sure.” 
A plurality of independents, 40 percent, said they would not vote for a “Democratic Socialist,” compared to 24 percent who said they would. 
An even greater majority, 73 percent, of self-described liberals said they would support a “Democratic Socialist,” and most 2024 voters of former Vice President Kamala Harris, 64 percent, said they would as well. 
Only five percent of 2024 Trump voters said the same. 
The survey also revealed that more Democrats view socialism more favorably than capitalism  34 percent choosing socialism and 22 percent choosing capitalism. 
Additionally, 58 percent of Democrats view socialism in general “favorably.” 
The survey was taken June 26  29, 2026, among 1,606 respondents. 
It has a +/- 3.2 percent margin of error. 
The rise of socialism in the Democrat Party has been well-documented, making waves after New York City elected a socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani. 
Since then, Mamdani-endorsed socialist candidates in the state have ousted establishment Democrats in their respective primaries. 
“…But still alarming that a majority of people are voting for socialists,” Sen. 
Rand Paul said during a recent appearance on Breitbart News Daily. 
“I wrote a book a few years ago, The Case Against Socialism, and in it we talked about some of the polls where, you know, majority of young people are thinking, hey, socialism sounds good, why don’t we try it.” 
“They don’t understand  the disaster that is Venezuela, the disaster that is Cuba, the disaster that was China, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, all these places,” the senator said. 
“What they understand it to be is fairness, and they’re like, well, it’s just not fair that you make twice as much money as me, and we’re just going to make it fair.” 
Paul added that young people equate that idea of “fairness” with socialism, failing to realize that “equal outcome leads to a disaster” such as food shortages, lack of wealth, “and all the things that we have” with capitalism. 
“It’s ignorance, but it is alarming, and then the other, the other possibility, though, is [the] left goes so far left that maybe they can’t win general elections, but in New York, all these people will win,” he added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.1%Hannah Knudsen: 4.5%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias26.1%This article: 3.7%Hannah Knudsen: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias3.7%This article: 9.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.6%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 3.7%Hannah Knudsen: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.1%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias2.0%This article: 7.7%Hannah Knudsen: 16.2%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.1%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Hannah Knudsen: 0.8%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias13.4%This article: 21.4%Hannah Knudsen: 19.5%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias21.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.5%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Hannah Knudsen: 1.4%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error6.7%This article: 6.7%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias6.7%This article: 6.7%Hannah Knudsen: 5.2%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Hannah Knudsen: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Hannah Knudsen: 2.3%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias7.9%This article: 5.5%Hannah Knudsen: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Hannah Knudsen: 5.4%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem7.9%This article: 6.7%Hannah Knudsen: 4.5%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man6.7%This article: 8.1%Hannah Knudsen: 2.4%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority8.1%This article: 15.7%Hannah Knudsen: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma15.7%This article: 7.7%Hannah Knudsen: 3.8%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope7.7%This article: 8.1%Hannah Knudsen: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning8.1%This article: 15.5%Hannah Knudsen: 8.8%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization15.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.1%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.3%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 11.9%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 2.3%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.6%Hannah Knudsen: 2.7%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.6%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.8%Hannah Knudsen: 1.2%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal13.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.3%Hannah Knudsen: 1.6%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.7%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground4.7%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.4%Hannah Knudsen: 2.6%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote9.4%This article: 2.6%Hannah Knudsen: 2.7%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.6%This article: 13.2%Hannah Knudsen: 14.3%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice13.2%This article: 7.7%Hannah Knudsen: 3.3%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination7.7%This article: 6.7%Hannah Knudsen: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.7%This article: 18.3%Hannah Knudsen: 13.7%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Knudsen: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

491 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker38%attributed speech302writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRand Paul • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRand Paul • 40 words • 0.0% coverageRand Paul • 28 words • 100.0% coverageRand Paul • 33 words • 0.0% coverageRand Paul • 38 words • 100.0% coverageRand Paul • 39 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rand Paul

94%flagged-word coverage
189 attributed words100% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Politically Right Leaning +27.8 ptsWriter: 7.6%Rand Paul: 35.4%35.4%Biased Writer Voice-21.5 ptsWriter: 21.5%Rand Paul: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+20.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rand Paul: 20.1%20.1%Unattributed Quote-15.2 ptsWriter: 15.2%Rand Paul: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-10.9 ptsWriter: 10.9%Rand Paul: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Rand Paul: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.