Keyword summary
0% 34 analyzed articles/videos 4,972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nba Finals results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 12,883 hits . Analysis detected 92,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 105,834 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,250 of 36,891 keywords). This Nba Finals is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Nba Finals
Keyword details
Total words: 105,834
Article count: 34
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score34 analyzed articles105.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst