Gothamist76%

It’s OK if you're just joining the Knicks bandwagon: Here’s what to know for Game 5 37%

By Apolline Lamy22% David Giambusso0%

6/12/2026, 8:29:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 407 hits. Analysis detected 2,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,549 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the article peer group.

Even if you haven’t watched a single game of the Knicks' historic NBA Finals run, Saturday’s Game 5 against the Spurs in San Antonio is appointment television as the Knicks vie to win it all. 
The moment is unique in New York City history as the Knicks are possibly the one New York team that unites the whole town, usually in misery. 
(Yes, we have the Nets, but  not the same). 
But Knicks fans’ long winter of discontent may soon be made glorious summer and America’s biggest city is more electric than ever. 
So, if you’re just joining the orange and blue bandwagon (no shade), here’s what to know: 
<b>You may have already missed the best game of the series</b> 
On Wednesday night, the Knicks recovered from a 29-point deficit at halftime in the biggest NBA Finals comeback since the league began tracking these stats (which, for reasons passing understanding, it only started doing in 1997). 
OG Anunoby tipped in the ball just as the final buzzer was going off in what Knicks coach Mike Brown said was the most iconic shot in basketball history. 
But before Wednesday, the Knicks had already made history just by getting to the finals at all. 
The Knickerbockers haven’t been to the finals since 1999 and they haven’t won since 1973. 
And it's not just that they were unlucky: Throughout much of the 21st Century the Knicks have objectively stunk. 
The team cycled through players, coaches and executives and became the laughingstock of the NBA. 
After losing the finals to, yes, the Spurs in 1999, the team endured two decades of loserdom, making it to the playoffs only four times between 2002 and 2020. 
Now, odds that the drought may be over are increasing: Only once in NBA Finals history has a team led 3-1 and lost the series. 
Basically if you love New York City at all, you kind of have a duty to watch Saturday night. 
But that’s OK, because it will be virtually impossible to walk through the five boroughs without seeing a screen. 
<b>Where to watch: everywhere </b> 
The game will start at 8:30 p.m. at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio and will be broadcast on ABC. 
You’re likely to stumble across the game even if you’re not looking for it. 
The city will be airing Game 5 at 130 LinkNYC kiosks along city streets, after first airing Game 4 on a few dozen kiosks Wednesday evening. 
It had been the first time a sporting event was livestreamed at the stations, which normally provide Wi-Fi and bulletins on city services. 
City officials say they first reached out to the NBA on Monday and the sports organization was enthusiastic about the no-cost arraignment. 
But the city isn't saying which specific kiosks will show the game, so you’ll have to keep your eyes peeled. 
But here are a few of the more popular (or quirky) destinations for planned gatherings: 
* Brooklyn Bowl has been hosting big watch parties through the series. 
* Top of the Rock at Rockefeller Center is also hosting one. 
Wollman Rink in Central Park has been another popular destination. 
* If you want to combine dancing and the basketball game, nightclubs like Elsewhere are also hosting screenings. 
* At least one funeral home is hosting watch parties if you’d like to commune with fans past. 
Frankly  walk into virtually any bar and there’s a good chance you’ll see the game on. 
Neighborhood Reddit and Facebook groups have been assembling ad-hoc lists. 
There are also hundreds of local watch parties happening around the five boroughs. 
People have been putting up screens outside their houses and apartment buildings. 
And business is booming for a lot of watering holes. 
Vanessa Whalen, who owns the pub The Black Bull in Brooklyn Heights, said she’s been in the unfortunate position of having to turn people away. 
“I don't want to overcrowd. 
You have to remember things like you have two toilets in a place. 
You don't want a huge line for that,” Whalen said. 
“You have to remember how hot it gets in a bar because the AC can't handle so many hot bodies.” 
(We don’t want to start any undue panic, but Whalen also complained of a supply chain issue in getting beer. 
One of her usual distributors was out and she briefly had to scramble to find another.) 
At least one bar will *not* be playing the Knicks. 
Wilka’s, one of at least three lesbian sports bars in the city, has proudly declared a no-male sports policy and they’re sticking to their guns. 
<b>OK, but what about the Garden? 
</b> 
If you’re hoping to watch outside Madison Square Garden, which would be a perfectly normal expectation in other cities, you may be out of luck. 
James Dolan, the owner of the Knicks and MSG, complained Wednesday that Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the NYPD were putting too many restrictions on the stadium’s watch party planned for that night. 
The NYPD and mayor pushed back, saying it was Dolan who asked to limit the number of attendees and the city had a responsibility to provide a safe environment for fans. 
Dolan refused to put up screens for fans and the watch party was canceled. 
At least one person was seriously assaulted that night and close to 56 others were arrested for breaking a variety of public nuisance laws. 
As of Friday afternoon, there had been no word of whether Madison Square Garden will host a watch party on Saturday. 
<b>It’s been really, really hot though.</b> 
The tail end of this week has been brutal, but the weather is expected to improve somewhat over Thursday and Friday’s heat and humidity. 
Temps at night will get down to the low 70s and the daytime peak is forecast at 86 degrees. 
Still, if you’ll be out in the heat, grab a water bottle and stay hydrated. 
<b>So what’s next? 
</b> 
If the Knicks win Saturday, you’ll probably hear it. 
Knicks fans will flood the streets in celebration of their first championship in more than half a century. 
If they lose, it’s back to New York City for Game 6 Tuesday night. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.8%Apolline Lamy: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Apolline Lamy: 2.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic9.5%This article: 2.6%Apolline Lamy: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.6%This article: 3.4%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Apolline Lamy: 2.1%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 1.3%Apolline Lamy: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion1.3%This article: 2.4%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.7%Apolline Lamy: 5.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias13.7%This article: 2.4%Apolline Lamy: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 18.3%Apolline Lamy: 3.7%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error3.0%This article: 3.1%Apolline Lamy: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.1%This article: 10.0%Apolline Lamy: 2.5%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias10.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.7%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.7%Apolline Lamy: 2.1%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority5.7%This article: 3.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma3.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.1%Apolline Lamy: 5.6%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization21.1%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.0%Apolline Lamy: 1.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon6.0%This article: 24.1%Apolline Lamy: 3.4%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion24.1%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.3%Apolline Lamy: 1.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.3%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.8%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.8%This article: 1.2%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.2%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.4%Apolline Lamy: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal7.4%This article: 1.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.0%This article: 1.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.4%Apolline Lamy: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote5.4%This article: 3.8%Apolline Lamy: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 39.0%Apolline Lamy: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice39.0%This article: 6.3%Apolline Lamy: 2.7%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination6.3%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Apolline Lamy: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.7%Apolline Lamy: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.7%

1044 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers23%attributed speech800writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageMike Brown • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageBrooklyn Bowl • 12 words • 100.0% coverageRockefeller Center • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageVanessa Whalen • 25 words • 0.0% coverageVanessa Whalen • 5 words • 100.0% coverageVanessa Whalen • 13 words • 0.0% coverageVanessa Whalen • 10 words • 0.0% coverageVanessa Whalen • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageVanessa Whalen • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWilka’s • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageJames Dolan • 32 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJames Dolan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Brown

100%flagged-word coverage
29 attributed words12% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+98.6 ptsWriter: 1.4%Mike Brown: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+97.3 ptsWriter: 2.8%Mike Brown: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-47.8 ptsWriter: 47.8%Mike Brown: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -22.8 ptsWriter: 22.8%Mike Brown: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Mike Brown: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.