Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Giambusso results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 1,580 hits . Analysis detected 11,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,889 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,006 of 6,162 authors). This David Giambusso is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. David Giambusso
Author details
Total words: 9,889
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst