Author summary
79% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosemary Misdary results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 2,011 hits . Analysis detected 17,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,580 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,431 of 6,246 authors). This Rosemary Misdary is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Rosemary Misdary
Author details
Total words: 19,580
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst