Gothamist77%

NYC stargazers can enjoy 'sun grazer' comet in April as weather warms up 0%

By Rosemary Misdary79%

3/29/2026, 12:01:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 473 faulty-reasoning hits from 505 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

There’s a comet blazing through our solar system this month. 
Starting around April 5, Comet C/2026 A1 MAPS will be roughly 89 million miles from Earth, making its closest approach to the sun. 
That’s close enough that the comet could be visible to the naked eye in New York City. 
This month's astronomical agenda also includes the first manned moon launch in 50 years, weather permitting. 
April will be capped with the Lyrids meteor shower. 
“April is a busy month for the night sky,” said Bart Fried, member of the American Astronomical Society. 
“”You got a lot of cool stuff happening this month.” 
The comet is just over a mile in diameter. 
It’s considered a sun grazer, meaning it comes very close to the sun (nearly a half-million miles). 
The comet’s proximity to the sun means it gets a hefty dose of radiation that makes it appear brighter, with a long tail. 
There’s a chance the comet could break up when it gets close to the sun and fizzles out. 
The best way for New Yorkers to spot the comet it is to look southwest, where the sun is setting at dusk. 
The comet will be very high in the sky from April 5 to 8, after it has completed its closest approach to the sun. 
“Comets are notoriously fickle,” said Jackie Faherty, astrophysicist at the American Museum of Natural History. 
“As exciting as they might be, sometimes they just peter out on us, but it’s got a lot of potential. 
It could be as bright as Venus.” 
Odds are also increasing that NASA will give the green light to its first manned lunar mission in a half-century. 
The earliest liftoff for Artemis II is 6:24 p.m. on April 1. 
Alternate dates run through April 6. 
Coverage of the launch and daily conversations with the crew during the mission will be livestreamed on NASA+. 
The 10-day mission will have a figure-eight flight path that will orbit the Earth and the moon without landing. 
The purpose is to test the space launch system for the next phase, Artemis III, which will send humans to land on the moon by 2028. 
“NASA, from everything that I've been hearing and reading and seeing, they seem fairly confident that we're gonna get an April launch,” Faherty said. 
The date of takeoff from Kennedy Space Center in Florida depends on weather and safety checks. 
From April 14-30, the Lyrids meteor shower will light up the sky with shooting stars. 
The peak is April 21 and 22, when up to 20 meteors will appear per hour, traveling at more than 100,000 miles per hour. 
The best viewing time is after 10 p.m. 
With the arrival of warmer nights, free stargazing events are happening across the city. 
The Amateur Astronomers Association hosts weekly events with telescopes across the five boroughs, including an event on April 24 on the flight deck of the Intrepid Museum docked on the Hudson River. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Rosemary Misdary: 3.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.5%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Rosemary Misdary: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias5.9%This article: 10.1%Rosemary Misdary: 10.3%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect10.1%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.4%Rosemary Misdary: 7.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias16.4%This article: 4.0%Rosemary Misdary: 3.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 3.0%Rosemary Misdary: 7.3%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.1%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.9%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.3%Rosemary Misdary: 6.9%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority11.3%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.1%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 4.0%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.3%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 6.3%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 1.7%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.9%Rosemary Misdary: 3.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.9%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.7%Rosemary Misdary: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote6.7%This article: 2.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.0%This article: 14.5%Rosemary Misdary: 3.0%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice14.5%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 3.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rosemary Misdary: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Rosemary Misdary: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.3%

505 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech389writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageBart Fried • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJackie Faherty • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJackie Faherty • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJackie Faherty • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageJackie Faherty • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageAmateur Astronomers Association • 32 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jackie Faherty

100%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words57% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote+33.8 ptsWriter: 2.6%Jackie Faherty: 36.4%36.4%Biased Writer Voice-18.8 ptsWriter: 18.8%Jackie Faherty: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Jackie Faherty: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Jackie Faherty: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.