Keyword summary
82% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health-And-Science results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,659 hits . Analysis detected 9,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,729 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (18,580 of 35,692 keywords). This Health-And-Science is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Health-And-Science
Keyword details
Total words: 8,729
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst