Author summary
8% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle McClenagan results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 3,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,050 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 2% (6,294 of 6,363 authors). This Kyle McClenagan is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Kyle McClenagan
Author details
Total words: 10,050
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 0.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst