Author summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominic Anthony Walsh results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 164 hits . Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,526 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,730 of 6,316 authors). This Dominic Anthony Walsh is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Dominic Anthony Walsh
Author details
Total words: 2,526
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst