Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dominic Walsh results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 223 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Dominic Walsh is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dominic Walsh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Dominic Walsh (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,488
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos