Topic summary
69% 54 analyzed articles/videos 20,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nba results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 13,922 hits . Analysis detected 125,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 134,934 analyzed words across 54 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (13,138 of 15,142 topics). This Nba is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Nba
Topic details
Total words: 134,934
Article count: 54
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score54 analyzed articles134.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst