Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Santana results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 723 hits . Analysis detected 5,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,121 of 6,316 authors). This Christian Santana is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Christian Santana
Author details
Total words: 5,720
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.6% 12.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst