Topic summary
58% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wars results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,696 hits . Analysis detected 14,936 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,108 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,076 of 15,522 topics). This Wars is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Wars
Topic details
Total words: 13,108
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst