Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph A. Wulfsohn results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 1,694 hits . Analysis detected 14,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,528 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (909 of 6,359 authors). This Joseph A. Wulfsohn is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group. Joseph A. Wulfsohn
Author details
Total words: 6,528
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.7% percentile 5.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 15.8% 15.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.9% 25.9% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 18.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Author 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst