Topic summary
82% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US UK Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,081 hits . Analysis detected 10,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,099 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (6,947 of 16,236 topics). This US UK Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. US UK Relations
Topic details
Total words: 8,099
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst