Author summary
51%6 analyzed articles/videos1,861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rena Rowe results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,287 hits. Analysis detected 8,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,775 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,803 of 6,170 authors). This Rena Rowe is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Rena Rowe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
39%Rena Rowe (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,775
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate