New York Democrats join protest outside empty ICE warehouse ahead of promised immigration crackdown 52%

By Rena Rowe52%

7/9/2026, 12:45:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 613 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of 52% (10,499 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the article peer group.

A group of protesters , including elected officials, gathered outside an empty warehouse in Newburgh, New York , on Tuesday amid concerns the facility could become a future Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center. 
Among the speakers was Rep. 
Pat Ryan (D-NY), who argued that the prospect of a large immigration detention facility evoked some of history’s darkest chapters and suggested Orange County had been unfairly singled out. 
“Now twice here in our own backyard,” Ryan said , “the very people elected by the American people have turned their backs on that declaration, on our Constitution, on our Bill of Rights, on our patriotic values as Americans that we care for everyone. 
And when we say liberty and justice for all, it means actually all.” 
The reaction follows reports over the past week that the empty warehouse connected to a General Services Administration lease could be considered as a future ICE detention site, although the federal government has not announced any plans for the property. 
Following the rally, Ryan reiterated his opposition on X , writing: “No ICE in Newburgh. 
No ICE in Chester. 
No ICE ANYWHERE in the Hudson Valley. 400+ neighbors. 
Rallying together with one voice, one message.” 
No ICE in Newburgh. 
No ICE in Chester. 
No ICE ANYWHERE in the Hudson Valley. 
400+ neighbors. 
Rallying together with one voice, one message. 
WE WILL WIN THIS FIGHT pic.twitter.com/YG01l2OTit 
 Pat Ryan (@PatRyanUC) July 8, 2026 
Ryan has faced close elections during his time in politics, winning his last election in 2022 with 50.6% of the vote to his opponent’s 49.3%. 
The day before the protest, Republican congressional nominee Jackie Auringer also opposed the possible Newburgh facility, though she placed the blame on New York’s Democratic leadership. 
Auringer and Ryan will face off in November for a seat representing New York’s 18th Congressional District. 
“Albany Democrats did not make immigration enforcement more humane, they made it more chaotic,” Auringer said . 
“They passed laws that defy federal immigration law and block cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, which does nothing to reduce the need to process illegal immigrants. 
It only pushes Washington toward more costly options, away from existing local capacity, and into a system that makes life harder for those being detained.” 
The demonstration comes as border czar Tom Homan has vowed to expand ICE operations in New York dramatically. 
“I made [Gov. 
Kathy Hochul (D-NY)] a promise. 
‘You’re going to see more ICE agents than you’ve ever seen in New York City, and it’s coming,’” Homan said during an appearance on Fox & Friends last month. 
“I’m keeping my promise. 
We’re going to send more ICE agents to New York because you took away the efficiencies of safe arrests in county jails.” 
Homan said the ICE surge would primarily target New York City’s five boroughs, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens, and Staten Island, rather than upstate New York or Long Island. 
Protest organizers highlighted their previous campaign opposing a proposed ICE detention center in Chester, a plan that was ultimately scrapped. 
MAMDANI LASHES OUT AT RICH AND POWERFUL ‘TURNING US AGAINST ONE ANOTHER’ DURING ALTERNATIVE AMERICA 250 SPEECH 
The warehouse, located at 800 Corporate Blvd. in the Town of Newburgh near Stewart International Airport, is a 60,143-square-foot, single-story building situated on 9.5 acres. 
The demonstration also comes during heightened tensions surrounding ICE detention facilities elsewhere. 
In June, police arrested at least 30 people during protests outside Delaney Hall in New Jersey on charges including assaulting law enforcement officers and other felony offenses. 
The demonstrations began after House Democrats attempted to inspect the facility over Memorial Day weekend. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.2%Rena Rowe: 1.7%Washington Examiner: 5.3%Confirmation Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Rena Rowe: 2.1%Washington Examiner: 3.2%Availability Heuristic11.6%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.1%Washington Examiner: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 6.4%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Rena Rowe: 9.7%Washington Examiner: 8.6%Framing Effect10.1%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.5%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.5%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Rena Rowe: 0.8%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.3%This article: 1.6%Rena Rowe: 3.6%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Optimism Bias1.6%This article: 4.1%Rena Rowe: 0.5%Washington Examiner: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 28.9%Rena Rowe: 5.2%Washington Examiner: 9.3%Negativity Bias28.9%This article: 10.0%Rena Rowe: 6.6%Washington Examiner: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias10.0%This article: 7.8%Rena Rowe: 1.3%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error7.8%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Rena Rowe: 1.9%Washington Examiner: 2.2%In-Group Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.2%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 2.7%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.0%Rena Rowe: 1.7%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Recency Bias9.0%This article: 6.7%Rena Rowe: 0.9%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.5%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.2%Rena Rowe: 3.6%Washington Examiner: 4.0%Appeal to Authority4.2%This article: 3.8%Rena Rowe: 1.3%Washington Examiner: 3.0%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.6%Washington Examiner: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.4%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.1%Rena Rowe: 2.7%Washington Examiner: 8.9%Hasty Generalization4.1%This article: 2.0%Rena Rowe: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 0.3%Red Herring2.0%This article: 6.5%Rena Rowe: 1.4%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Bandwagon6.5%This article: 22.2%Rena Rowe: 14.7%Washington Examiner: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion22.2%This article: 2.1%Rena Rowe: 2.8%Washington Examiner: 1.8%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 13.1%Rena Rowe: 1.6%Washington Examiner: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.1%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.9%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.2%Rena Rowe: 0.3%Washington Examiner: 0.7%Burden of Proof4.2%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.4%Rena Rowe: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 2.2%Anecdotal4.4%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.5%Rena Rowe: 2.8%Washington Examiner: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.5%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 2.2%Washington Examiner: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.0%Washington Examiner: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 1.2%Washington Examiner: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.4%Rena Rowe: 2.3%Washington Examiner: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 18.3%Rena Rowe: 3.2%Washington Examiner: 11.5%Biased Writer Voice18.3%This article: 2.1%Rena Rowe: 0.7%Washington Examiner: 3.5%Indoctrination2.1%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.2%Washington Examiner: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Rena Rowe: 1.2%Washington Examiner: 4.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Rena Rowe: 0.8%Washington Examiner: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

613 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers52%attributed speech295writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 29 words • 100.0% coveragePat Ryan • 44 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coveragePat Ryan • 15 words • 100.0% coveragePat Ryan • 4 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 7 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 4 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 4 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 7 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 2 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 7 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 6 words • 0.0% coveragePat Ryan • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJackie Auringer • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJackie Auringer • 26 words • 100.0% coverageJackie Auringer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageTom Homan • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 4 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTom Homan • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jackie Auringer

100%flagged-word coverage
68 attributed words21% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice+18.9 ptsWriter: 19.3%Jackie Auringer: 38.2%38.2%Politically Right Leaning -6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Jackie Auringer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.