Author summary
93% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kurt Zindulka results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 1,353 hits . Analysis detected 12,337 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,159 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,261 of 6,628 authors). This Kurt Zindulka is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Kurt Zindulka
Author details
Total words: 7,159
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.0% percentile 4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.7% 15.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.1% 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.5% 4.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst